stuff robots make possible

or how frozen pizza is gonna die

there’s no singularity moment coming for robots.

a robot can’t become “a million times better than a human” because mass and motion don’t scale like code does. intelligence might compound. torque doesn’t.

the tricky part about ai is its runaway potential. the terrifying slope. robots don’t have that. they might get more efficient, more precise, more specialized. but they’ll always be bound to the physical world. and in the physical world, you hit limits fast.

the real edge with robots isn’t strength or speed. it’s cost per hour. robots aren’t just about replacing humans. they’re about making previously ridiculous things affordable.

so many tasks are technically doable today, but no one does them. why? because they’d cost a fortune in human labor. just dumb levels of money to get something minor done. the robot advantage is they drop that price floor.

in history, only the ultra-rich could afford that kind of flex. pharaohs with armies of workers. industrialists with custom everything. most people don’t operate at that level.

but as robots get cheaper, that gap shrinks. no, not everyone’s getting their own great pyramid. but stuff that used to be laughably expensive will start happening quietly, all over the place. stuff like:

ultra orderliness

imagine a world where cleanliness is constant, not a once-a-week battle.

robots are already starting to make that real. cleaning bots and autonomous lawn mowers are shifting our expectations. what used to be a chore that you’d tackle on a weekend is now an ongoing, seamless process.

this leads to what i’d call “ultra orderliness.” a level of cleanliness so high it almost seems too perfect to be true. tasks that were once too expensive to do continuously can now happen at all hours.

i had this thought as i walked through berlin, noticing the sad state of many green spaces. i realized that maintaining them at the level of a baroque garden isn’t something a city can afford. but if the cost of upkeep dropped significantly, a much higher standard could be reached. weeds would be a thing of the past, and delicate plants that need constant care would thrive. cities could look like beautiful parks, and even though overgrown spaces have their own charm, perfection would be within reach.

on a practical level, we could also solve issues like hospital infections, with robo-cleaning teams working nonstop to keep everything spotless.

micro art

micro art is the kind of stuff that’s personal, specific, and usually not worth the effort.

until now.

ai already makes it easy to generate art, text, music, whatever. and that’s great. but physical art still hits different. a custom wall piece, a mosaic, a bizarre topiary shaped like your inside joke. right now those things take time and skill and money. they’re rare for a reason.

but if robots can start producing this stuff on location, cheaply, that opens up a floodgate. micro sculptures. personalized spaces. art that speaks to exactly two people and exists just to delight them.

you could leave easter eggs for your friends in furniture, sidewalks, random trees. everything becomes a canvas. and because it’s affordable, you do it just because.

micro art lets you go deeper. more personal. think puzzles with hidden jokes. objects layered with references only one person would get. gifts that feel like a collaboration between mozart, goethe, and a very stoned picasso.

the world could become a treasure hunt. and the cost is basically zero.

dynamic objects & surfaces

right now, physical objects feel frozen in time.

a billboard is installed. a mural is painted. a product display is arranged. and then it just sits there. same image, same surface, same message.

but what if that wasn't the default?

we’re already used to digital things updating. websites change daily. apps shift design overnight. even google’s logo plays dress-up every morning. what if our physical world did the same?

i think advertising is where this could shine. because most ads fade into nothing after the first impression. they’re static, repetitive, predictable. your brain learns to ignore them.

screens tried to fix this but made it worse. too much light, too much motion. public screens are sensory spam. i block them out on instinct.

what would be better is a slower, quieter kind of change. surfaces that evolve. posters that develop. art that grows. something real. something you could touch. and something different each day.

with robots and ai, this isn’t sci-fi. you could reprint parts of a design every night. change colors. rearrange layers. it’s a subtle shift, but over time it creates a living canvas.

even at home, you could hang a painting that quietly rewrites itself at night. a slow-burning art loop. something worth checking every morning.

freer leisure time

when people talk about robots and ai, the conversation almost always turns to jobs. who gets replaced. who’s safe. what disappears.

but if you zoom out, there’s a ton of “soft labor” in everyday life that also could go away. the kind of work we do in our so-called free time. cooking, cleaning, laundry, organizing. it’s not office work, but it still eats your day.

some of this is already chipped away by machines. dishwashers. vacuums. mowers. but robots could take it much further. whole categories of daily effort might just… vanish.

so then what? what do you do with those extra hours?

some routines won’t budge. you still need to sleep. you still need to shower. but there’s one old tradition that might make a comeback: the grooming servant.

not the modern toilet, the classic one. the full experience of someone helping you get ready. today that’s reserved for celebs, actors, weddings. but if robots could offer that to everyone? maybe that raises the baseline. maybe we all start experimenting with bolder looks again. maybe everyone gets a little weirder, a little more styled, a little more fun.

private absolutism

we’ve always said “my home is my castle,” but it’s been more metaphor than fact.

robots flip that. suddenly, you’re not just living in a space. you’re ruling over it. every command, every whim, every strange little task gets done. not just the useful ones. even the ridiculous ones.

it starts to feel like ancient rome, minus the moral baggage. the question is, do we feel powerful? do we feel like emperors? or is it more like using a blender, just another tool doing what it’s told?

maybe it depends on how human the robot feels. if it talks back, if it smiles, if it remembers what makes you mad. maybe we get emotionally attached. or maybe it just fades into the background like a fridge.

and no, your robot isn’t going to go spartacus on you. the risk isn’t individual rebellion. if ai ever goes rogue, it’ll be the whole system, not your housekeeper.

but the social dynamics are real. we’ve spent years talking about historical exploitation, and now we’re about to become mini slave masters again. polite ones. digital ones. but still. that muscle of command is coming back.

what is coming is a new kind of domestic identity. full customization, full control, full eccentricity. your home becomes a mirror of your mind. no more identical chairs and neutral palettes. we’re about to see living spaces that feel like opera sets. or lucid dreams.

and everyone’s the director of their own tiny kingdom.

low tech solutions

there’s a historical theory that societies with slaves stopped innovating. when you’ve got human labor on tap, you don’t need clever machines. just more people to do the work.

now swap “slaves” for robots. same question. if your house robot is cheap and tireless, do you still buy new appliances?

maybe not. why get a $1,000 robotic mower when your robot can cut the grass with scissors? why bother with a dishwasher if the robot can do it the old-fashioned way? even a fan becomes optional if the robot just waves a leaf at you.

this is the low-tech loop. high-function general purpose robots make low-tech tools useful again.

it’s like what smartphones did to other gadgets. cameras, calendars, alarms, all collapsed into one machine. robots might collapse all your household tools into a single unit that just does whatever you ask, however basic the method.

and yeah, maybe that robot could be doing more important things. but most of us won’t have 24 hours of high-stakes tasks. once the main stuff’s done, we’ll absolutely have it fold our socks to origami figures or clean grout with a toothbrush.

and with that, frozen pizza dies. if your robo-chef can cook from scratch, why settle for pre-made sludge?

robo management

robot management is going to be a whole field of design.

it only scales when the average person can use them. that means simple language. no code. no manuals. just talk to it like you would a person.

but even then, miscommunication is the default. the robot might take things too literally. or miss the tone. or maybe your instruction sucked.

so the robot needs to show you what it thinks you meant. before it acts. that might be a voice summary, or better yet, a visual mockup. like, here’s the plan. approve?

if the request is dangerous or illegal or impossible, it should say so. offer a workaround. or warn you but let you continue and take responsibility.

robots aren’t thinkers. they’re doers. that’s actually a plus. no surprises. every step is measurable. they should be able to estimate how long things will take, recalculate when stuff goes wrong, just like a gps.

and if you’ve got a group of robots? coordination becomes way easier than with people. no mood swings. no miscommunications. no drama. organizing a robot-only team on a construction site could be ten times faster than anything we do today.

every task is just state A to state Z. define both. let the robot calculate the options. fast route, cheap route, quiet route, safe route. you pick. it runs.

and yeah, big social shifts are coming. but i’d rather embrace that than freeze time through regulations out of fear. the present never lasts. all we can do is build toward a better next version.

---

i also have another blog you can just solve things in which i just solve things.